Referring to the entire episode (the virus origins, the pandemic, and the hapless and heavy-handed response), Weinstein labels it mass murder and calls for a Nuremberg trial. This was and continues to be organized crime on a global scale. Everyone involved should go to jail.
But we all know that no one is going to be held accountable. The only way that the world might demand accountability is if the death toll were to skyrocket all these years later. Part of the problem is that very few who received the mRNA so-called "vaccine" want to admit, to themselves or otherwise, what an ill-conceived decision that was. And how many people allowed their children to receive this? Who wants to admit that kind of error?
So the criminals remain largely in place. And without doubt, they will do it again.
The film is sort of Death Wish meets contemporary European immigration. With Armie Hammer stepping in for Charles Bronson.
I cannot say that Death Wish was ever my cup of tea. Too much gratuitous violence, and in this case gratuitous sex, for my taste. But if the powers that be in Europe, particularly the increasingly authoritarian German regime, feel the need to censor it, then I must do my small part to fight the censorship.
So is the movie any good? Again, it's not really to my taste. But if you like the John Wick series, you will like this. And because the targets are immigrants rather than the mere thugs and criminals in Death Wish, there is definitely a political dimension to this film. In the end, whether or not you appreciate this film probably depends on your own political convictions.
I will add that both Armie Hammer and Costas Mandylor are excellent in their roles. Same for the supporting cast. I suppose the film is classified as low budget, but it is well made and the reduced budget did not interfere with the story.
In summary I would say that the movie is worth watching for its message. And here I mean, whether you agree with the message or not. You need to hear it. This problem is not going away. And I do not believe that European leaders will sincerely address it. European elites do not suffer the consequences of their policies and actions, so they do not care. Ultimately that is the message of this film.
The left is an intolerant religion and proud of it
I do not know if this is real or not; I hope it is. But even if it is not, I think it makes a fair point. Popular culture, media, and the education establishment endlessly foist left-of-center views on people from the right. And those on the left need not ever entertain any views from the right. They are actually proud of this.
Since Charlie Kirk's death, the organization he founded has gone off the rails. I think he was naive about the people he surrounded himself with; including his own wife. But that should not diminish his own contributions. The question asked here is paramount.
What is going on in Gaza? How do we know? For many months, I viewed this question as, well, you can accept reporting from Israel or you can accept reporting from Hamas. Take your pick.
I can tell you, I will never accept anything coming out of Hamas. Anyone who uses civilians as human shields is not honorable and not credible. But after Trump's appalling behavior since his second election, and after Thomas Massie's failed re-election, I have to question everything coming out of Israel as well. And while I am generally supportive of the war against Iran, it seems completely obvious to me that Benjamin Netanyahu is also not credible. And that he has some kind hold over Donald Trump. That also seems obvious.
We can speculate: It seems that Netanyahu wants to milk his hold over Trump for all it is worth, while he has the opportunity. Maybe he views this as now, while he has Trump in his pocket, or never. I have no idea what is really going on, but it is strange that the American president seems to be acting on behalf of another nation. While we may not know exactly what is going on, we can see the results. And we can know the tree by its fruit.
For many years, I have given Israel the benefit of the doubt. But I am just not sure this can continue. I am no longer convinced that they are deserving of our trust. On the other hand, the people who are convinced that there is a genocide happening in Gaza mostly seem to accept Hamas reporting, either directly or indirectly.
Anyway, this physician, Nick Maynard, does seem credible to me. Is he linked to Hamas, or Islam, or some Arab money, etc.? Maybe he holds some Arab-funded chair at Oxford? I do not know. He just seems believable. That alone does not make him honest, but judge his reporting for yourself.
I have been fooled before. Of course; we all have. And Gaza offers the most recent, and perhaps best, example of the Cartesian Crisis.
Broadly speaking, today we are witnessing the complete absence of honest journalism.
Gold: I have to censor myself partly because I might get killed by people who live around here
The British are doing this to themselves:
BREAKING: UK police stopped a woman from walking her dog, saying it could offend the local Muslim population — and ordered her off her own street. pic.twitter.com/aguR9J24zq
Youtube really does not want you to see this interview (recorded 30 June 2024). So they took it down. Peterson re-posted it on 4 October 2025:
Now here is a followup interview from 16 August 2024 (posted just hours ago on Youtube). Still shareable at this hour, but just to be safe, I'll embed the X/Twitter post below.
Watch these videos on Youtube while you can because I believe, sooner or later, they will take them down completely. Moving forward, I will embed the X/Twitter videos whenever I have a choice. Youtube has proven time and again that they are not to be trusted.
Finally, you can see Robinson's documentary, Silenced, which they refer to in both of these videos, here.
Watching these videos and Silenced it is clear that Britain has become a theocracy with dhimmi-servants running the government, the police, and the judiciary. And frankly, short of widespread violence, it is going to stay that way. The government seems completely immune to public outcry. I am pessimistic that the British people will be able to muster the necessary will and strength to dislodge the theocratic government.
I am sorry, but if you jail citizens for making comments on Facebook, do not be surprised if you get protests, riots, and violence. At this point the British government seems to believe that they can jail enough citizen dissidents to bring Facebook commentators to heel, and to quell the riots. And I fear they may be correct.
But at some point we have to fight for our countries. Yes, actually fight. And if we do not, we will lose them. That is where Britain is now. That is the choice that the British people now face.
Since Google has shadow-banned this video, I am happy to post it here. It was initially Unlisted on YouTube. It was certainly not unlisted by the producers, who want it widely seen, but surely by Google itself.
The film does a good job explaining how scientists were corrupted, and continue to be corrupted, into going along with the climate narrative. But one thing the film barely mentions is how politicians and other lefty elites have come to preach the narrative. I mean, what is their incentive?
If you could identify a problem that would allow for, and encourage the public to accept and even demand, leftist, big government, and authoritarian policies, could you come up with something more ideal than the climate narrative? This schtick ticks all the boxes for the leftist view of how the world should be run. It does not matter to lefty elites whether it is true or not if it allows them to bring about utopia with, most importantly, themselves in charge, demanding and enforcing how other people live.
So the lefty elites corrupt the scientists with government money and research grants, and the scientists duly report on the problem and how it is getting worse, which the elites use to justify more government and more power for themselves. It is an ongoing quid pro quo and...
It is the perfect scam.
It is worth noting that Google has also shadow-banned this website (Moore's Twilight Review). But since I view this site as much a personal journal as a public weblog, this fact does not really disturb me. Though that said, of course, we all want readers. Even if you type the complete URL of this site into the Google search bar, they cannot seem to find it. And how many people know the difference between the Google bar and their browser's address bar?
The left is scared to death of alternative views. I'm not sure why, but one does wonder if they are that unsure of their positions. Or are they hiding the absurdity of those positions? Rather than have an open debate on any number of issues, the preferred tactic of the left is to simply hide the alternatives. It is a sort of intellectual treason, and the most cowardly thing I have ever actually witnessed.
Google's actions are somewhat capricious. Search Ace of Spades HQ, a site further to the right than this one, and Google is happy to oblige – Obviously Ace is too big to hide and Google's perfidy would be all too obvious. And yes, one could make the argument that this site is simply too small to be included in their search results. Okay fine. But why deny the URL?
I mean, really, how long before Google takes down this website? Blogger (Blogspot) is a Google platform. They already shadow ban much of this site from Google search results. So we all must find and support new platforms. I don't like the fact that Rumble charges monthly fees – If you want to take on YouTube, you must provide an equally accessible alternative with comparable pricing. Nevertheless, we must not allow Google's censorship to remain unchecked.
Here, Glenn Greenwald does an amazing job of taking apart The Washington Post and their perfidious reporting. Watch to the end; it's worth every minute. The Post tagline is: Democracy Dies in Darkness. Of course it should be: We'll Keep You in the Dark. Or maybe: Orwellian Totalitarianism Requires Darkness.
