Lowe says that change can be driven through the ballot box. Well as a politician, he would have to say that, right? But as in California and Minnesota, I'm not at all sure that will work any more.
Lowe thinks that people will vote for things to get worse before they get better. That is wishful thinking; I do not believe that people will do that. Collapse is inevitable.
I mean in Britain you have an elite class and a government class who absolutely refuse to hold rapists accountable. Mind you, over decades. They minimize it, they dismiss it, they hide it. And it doing so, they prove themselves worse than the actual rapists.
And this is before we get to the vast crimes of the Covid "pandemic" response. Bret wonders aloud if the mRNA "vaccines" were not designed to create immunity (which so clearly, they were not), but rather purposefully designed to create a future venerability. To what, we cannot yet know. But given the players involved, this clearly is a possibility. This would certainly explain the unhinged enthusiasm for the jab from the powers that be.
Whether designed for immunity or future venerability, my question is, what other alternatives are there? Well there is pure profit. But to me, that does not adequately explain the multi-government, domestically and internationally, fervor. And the punishments for noncompliance.
In any case, these same people are in charge of the election processes. So my question is: Have we reached the end of functional democracy?
I think we have. These people must be dislodged and prosecuted. Keir Starmer must be jailed. Along with many thousands of his ilk. How will that happen?
The answer is obvious.